S.Albayrak Anasayfa Kategoriler

4.2 A small puzzle on CFTs

Let us consider a unitary Lorentzian CFT with a hermitian operator O(x). We know that

[D,O] = ΔO (4.1)

at the origin for the dilation operator D. If we impose that the scaling dimension Δ is real, then the right hand side is real hence we need D to be antihermitian, i.e. D = D. This makes sense as eλD is unitary for real scaling λ only if D is antihermitian.

Let us now consider the action of D on Hilbert space. As D annihilates vacuum, we have

Dϕ(0)|vacuum = [D,ϕ(0)]|vacuum = Δϕ(0)|vacuum (4.2)

showing that ϕ(0)vacuum needs to be an eigenfunction of the dilation operator D with eigenvalue Δ. However, this implies that D is a hermitian operator because only hermitian operators have real eigenvalues.1

Resolution: There is actually no paradox because D does not act on ϕ(x)vacuum, because it does not define a state in Hilbert space!

In Lorentzian signature, the operator valued fields ϕ(x) are not well-defined functions, but rather so-called tempered distributions: they define vectors in the Hilbert space only after they are being smeared with a Schwartz function:

dxf(x)ϕ(x)|vacuum (4.4)

Hence eqn. 4.2 is simply incorrect.

1This is easy to show: consider an inner product of two operators A and B where the product (A,B) is antilinear in its first argument and linear in the second. We define the hermitian conjugate of an operator D by the equality (DA,B) = (A,DB). Thus DA = λA implies DA = λA:

(DA,A) = (A,DA) = (A,λA) = λ(A,A) = (λA,A) (4.3)

hence D = ±D λ = ±λ for λbeing the complex conjugate of λ. This concludes the proof.